Reynolds v. Sims

Media Items
Reynolds v. Sims - Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Charles Morgan, Jr. (Argued the cause for the appellees)
W. McLean Pitts (Argued the cause for the appellants)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
23
Petitioner: 
Sims
Respondent: 
Reynolds
Consolidation: 
Vann et al. v. Baggett, Secretary of State of Alabama, et al., No. 27
McConnell et al. v. Baggett, Secretary of State of Alabama, et al., No. 41
Decided By: 
Warren Court (1962-1965)
Opinion: 
377 U.S. 533 (1964)
Categories: 
top100, conlaw, reapportionment, justiciability, voting, elections
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Reynolds v. Sims , 377 U.S. 533 (1964)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_23)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1961, M.O. Sims, David J. Vann (Vann v. Baggett), John McConnell (McConnell v. Baggett), and other voters from Jefferson County, Alabama, challenged the apportionment of the state legislature. The Alabama Constitution prescribed that each county was entitled to at least one representative and that there were to be as many senatorial districts as there were senators. Population variance ratios of as great as 41-to-1 existed in the Senate.

Question: 

Did Alabama's apportionment scheme violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by mandating at least one representative per county and creating as many senatorial districts as there were senators, regardless of population variances?

Conclusion: 

In an 8-to-1 decision, the Court upheld the challenge to the Alabama system, holding that Equal Protection Clause demanded "no less than substantially equal state legislative representation for all citizens...." Noting that the right to direct representation was "a bedrock of our political system," the Court held that both houses of bicameral state legislatures had to be apportioned on a population basis. States were required to "honest and good faith" efforts to construct districts as nearly of equal population as practicable.

Decisions

Decision: 8 votes for Sims, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Equal Protection

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Warren
Voted with the majority
Black
Voted with the majority
Douglas
Wrote a special concurrence
Clark
Wrote a dissent
Harlan
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote a special concurrence
Stewart
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Goldberg

Full Opinion by Justice Earl Warren