Search:
The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building
CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP SCOTUSblog / Justia / Appellate.Net
Home» Decades» 1960-1969» 1961» Chewning v. Cunningham

Chewning v. Cunningham

Docket: 63
Citation: 368 U.S. 443 (1962)
Petitioner: Chewning
Respondent: Cunningham

Case Media

Abstract

Argument: Monday, December 4, 1961
Decision: Monday, February 19, 1962
Issues: Criminal Procedure, Right to Counsel

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

None

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

 Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Chewning, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Right to Counsel
Voted with the majority
Warren
Voted with the majority
Black
Voted with the majority
Frankfurter
Wrote the majority opinion
Douglas
Voted with the majority
Clark
Wrote a special concurrence
Harlan
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Whittaker
Voted with the majority
Stewart
Full Opinion by Justice William O. Douglas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Chewning v. Cunningham, 368 U.S. 443 (1962),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_63/>
(last visited ).

CASES / JUSTICES / ADVOCATES / BENEFACTORS / ON THE DOCKET / HELP / DONATE New User? Register  Existing User? Login
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Oyez Copyright Statement