The Oyez Project: 1960 Term

Alaska v. Arctic Maid (No. 106)

No details yet.

American Automobile Assn. v. U.S. (No. 288)

Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state.

Anderson v. Alabama (No. 326)

No details yet.

Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Co. (No. 21)

No details yet.

Atchley v. California (No. 95)

No details yet.

Baker v. Carr (No. 6)

No details yet.

Baldonado v. California (No. 185)

No details yet.

Bell v. United States (No. 92)

No details yet.

Binks Mfg. Co. v. Ransburg Corp. (No. 501)

No details yet.

Boynton v. Virginia (No. 7)

No details yet.

Braden v. United States (No. 54)

No details yet.

Braunfeld v. Brown (No. 67)

No details yet.

Bullock v. South Carolina (No. 78)

No details yet.

Bulova Watch Co. v. United States (No. 241)

No details yet.

Burton v. Wilmington Pkg. Auth. (No. 164)

Dolree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials after an admittedly illegal police search of her home for a fugitive. She appealed her conviction on the basis of freedom of expression.

Bushnell v. Ellis (No. 561)

No details yet.

Cafeteria Workers v. Mcelroy (No. 97)

No details yet.

Callanan v. United States (No. 47)

No details yet.

Campbell v. United States (No. 53)

No details yet.

Carbo v. United States (No. 72)

No details yet.

Carpenters Local v. Labor Board (No. 68)

No details yet.

Chapman v. United States (No. 175)

No details yet.

Chaunt v. United States (No. 22)

No details yet.

Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R. Co. v. U.S. (No. 306)

Abraham Braunfeld owned a retail clothing and home furnishing store in Philadelphia. As an Orthodox Jew, he was prohibited by his faith from working on Saturday, the Sabbath. The Pennsylvania blue law only allowed certain stores to remain open for business on Sundays. Braunfeld's store was not one of those types allowed to be open. He challenged the law as a violation of the religious liberty clauses because he needed to be open six days a week for economic reasons and was prohibited from doing so by a tenet of his faith and the blue law.

Civil Aero. Bd. v. Delta Air Lines (No. 492)

No details yet.

Clancy v. United States (No. 88)

No details yet.

Cohen v. Hurley (No. 84)

No details yet.

Commissioner v. Lester (No. 376)

No details yet.

Communist Party v. Catherwood (No. 495)

No details yet.

Communist Party v. Control Board (No. 12)

No details yet.

Coppola v. United States (No. 153)

No details yet.

Costello v. United States (No. 59)

No details yet.

Culombe v. Connecticut (No. 161)

No details yet.

Deutch v. United States (No. 233)

No details yet.

Eastern R. Conf. v. Noerr Motors (No. 50)

No details yet.

Electrical Workers v. Labor Board (No. 321)

No details yet.

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs (No. 203)

No details yet.

F. P. C. v. Transcontinental Gas Corp. (No. 45)

No details yet.

Ferguson v. Georgia (No. 44)

No details yet.

Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Market (No. 11)

No details yet.

Garment Workers v. Labor Board (No. 284)

No details yet.

Goldberg v. Whitaker House Coop. (No. 274)

No details yet.

Gomillion v. Lightfoot (No. 32)

No details yet.

Gori v. United States (No. 486)

No details yet.

Green v. United States (No. 70)

No details yet.

Horton v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. (No. 478)

No details yet.

In Re Anastaplo (No. 58)

No details yet.

Irvin v. Dowd (No. 41)

No details yet.

James v. United States (No. 63)

No details yet.

Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co. (No. 151)

No details yet.

Kimbrough v. United States (No. 127)

No details yet.

Knetsch v. United States (No. 23)

No details yet.

Kolovrat v. Oregon (No. 102)

No details yet.

Konigsberg v. State Bar (No. 28)

No details yet.

Kossick v. United Fruit Co. (No. 96)

No details yet.

Labor Board v. News Syndicate Co. (No. 339)

No details yet.

Labor Board v. Radio Engineers (No. 69)

No details yet.

Lathrop v. Donohue (No. 200)

No details yet.

Laurens F. S. & L. v. S. C. Tax Comm'n (No. 126)

No details yet.

Lewis v. Manufacturers Nat. Bank (No. 94)

No details yet.

Lott v. United States (No. 238)

No details yet.

Louisiana v. N. A. A. C. P. (No. 294)

No details yet.

Lurk v. United States (No. 669)

No details yet.

Maintenance Employes v. U.S. (No. 681)

No details yet.

Mapp v. Ohio (No. 236)

No details yet.

Marcus v. Search Warrant (No. 225)

No details yet.

Maynard v. Durham & S. R. Co. (No. 183)

No details yet.

McGowan v. Maryland (No. 8)

No details yet.

Mcneal v. Culver (No. 52)

No details yet.

Mcphaul v. United States (No. 33)

No details yet.

Meyer v. United States (No. 13)

No details yet.

Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc. (No. 31)

No details yet.

Michigan Nat. Bank v. Michigan (No. 155)

No details yet.

Milanovich v. United States (No. 79)

No details yet.

Monroe v. Pape (No. 39)

No details yet.

Montana v. Kennedy (No. 198)

No details yet.

Moses Lake Homes v. Grant County (No. 212)

No details yet.

N. L. R. B. v. Mattison Machine Works (No. 74)

No details yet.

New York, N. H. & H. R. Co. v. Henagan (No. 38)

No details yet.

Newsom v. Smyth (No. 116)

No details yet.

Nolan v. Transocean Air Lines (No. 107)

No details yet.

Noto v. United States (No. 9)

No details yet.

Pan Am. Corp. v. Superior Court (No. 80)

No details yet.

Payne v. Madigan (No. 180)

No details yet.

Piemonte v. United States (No. 122)

No details yet.

Poe v. Ullman (No. 60)

No details yet.

Polites v. United States (No. 25)

No details yet.

Porter Co. v. Central Vermont R. Co. (No. 257)

No details yet.

Power Reactor Co. v. Electricians (No. 315)

No details yet.

Pugach v. Dollinger (No. 111)

No details yet.

Radiant Burners v. Peoples Gas Co. (No. 73)

No details yet.

Reck v. Pate (No. 181)

No details yet.

Reina v. United States (No. 29)

No details yet.

Reynolds v. Cochran (No. 115)

No details yet.

Rogers v. Richmond (No. 40)

No details yet.

Saldana v. United States (No. 176)

No details yet.

Sam Fox Publishing Co. v. U.S. (No. 56)

No details yet.

Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons (No. 219)

No details yet.

Shelton v. Tucker (No. 14)

No details yet.

Silverman v. United States (No. 66)

No details yet.

Slagle v. Ohio (No. 105)

No details yet.

Small Business Adm'n v. McClellan (No. 42)

No details yet.

Smith v. Bennett (No. 174)

No details yet.

Smith v. Butler (No. 313)

No details yet.

Stewart v. United States (No. 143)

No details yet.

System Federation v. Wright (No. 48)

No details yet.

Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Co. (No. 87)

No details yet.

Teamsters Local v. Labor Board (No. 64)

No details yet.

Thomas v. Virginia (No. 43)

No details yet.

Times Film Corp. v. Chicago (No. 34)

No details yet.

Torcaso v. Watkins (No. 373)

No details yet.

Travis v. United States (No. 10)

No details yet.

Two Guys v. Mcginley (No. 36)

No details yet.

Typographical Union v. Labor Board (No. 340)

No details yet.

U.S. v. Consolidated Edison Co. (No. 357)

No details yet.

U.S. v. John Hancock Mut. Ins. Co. (No. 18)

No details yet.

U.S. v. Mississippi Valley Co. (No. 26)

No details yet.

U.S. v. Virginia Electric Co. (No. 49)

No details yet.

United States v. Du Pont & Co. (No. 55)

No details yet.

United States v. Fruehauf (No. 91)

No details yet.

United States v. Hougham (No. 24)

No details yet.

United States v. Lucchese (No. 57)

No details yet.

United States v. Neustadt (No. 533)

No details yet.

United States v. Oregon (No. 329)

No details yet.

United States v. Shimer (No. 392)

No details yet.

Uphaus v. Wyman (No. 336)

No details yet.

Waterman Co. v. Dugan & Mcnamara (No. 35)

No details yet.

Wilkinson v. United States (No. 37)

No details yet.

Wilson v. Schnettler (No. 182)

No details yet.