Gomillion v. Lightfoot

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Philip Elman (Argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal)
Robert L. Carter (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
James J. Carter (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Fred D. Gray (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
32
Petitioner: 
Gomillion
Respondent: 
Lightfoot
Decided By: 
Warren Court (1958-1962)
Opinion: 
364 U.S. 339 (1960)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Gomillion v. Lightfoot , 364 U.S. 339 (1960)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_32)
Facts of the Case: 

An act of the Alabama legislature re-drew the electoral district boundaries of Tuskegee, replacing what had been a region with a square shape with a twenty-eight sided figure. The effect of the new district was to exclude essentially all blacks from the city limits of Tuskegee and place them in a district where no whites lived.

Question: 

Did the redrawing of Tuskegee's electoral district boundaries violate the Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution which prevents the United States or any individual state from denying a citizen the right to vote on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude?

Conclusion: 

The unanimous Court held that Act 140 of the Alabama legislature violated the Fifteenth Amendment. Justice Frankfurter admitted that states are insulated from judicial review when they exercise power "wholly within the domain of state interest." However, in this case, Alabama's representatives were unable to identify "any countervailing municipal function" which the act was designed to serve. It was clear to the Court that the irregularly shaped district was drawn with only one purpose in mind, namely, to deprive blacks of political power.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Gomillion, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Amendment 15: Fifteenth Amendment

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Warren
Voted with the majority
Black
Wrote the majority opinion
Frankfurter
Wrote a regular concurrence
Douglas
Voted with the majority
Clark
Voted with the majority
Harlan
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Wrote a special concurrence
Whittaker
Voted with the majority
Stewart

Full Opinion by Justice Felix Frankfurter