The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: January 15-16, 1958
Decision: Monday, June 30, 1958
Issues: First Amendment, Miscellaneous
Categories: first amendment, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, jurisdiction

Advocates

Robert L. Carter (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Edmon L. Rinehart (Argued the cause for the respondent)

Facts of the Case

As part of its strategy to enjoin the NAACP from operating, Alabama required it to reveal to the State's Attorney General the names and addresses of all the NAACP's members and agents in the state.

Question

Did Alabama's requirement violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion

Yes. The unanimous Court held that a compelled disclosure of the NAACP's membership lists would have the effect of suppressing legal association among the group's members. Nothing short of an "overriding valid interest of the State," something not present in this case, was needed to justify Alabama's actions.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for NAACP, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Association
Voted with the majority
Douglas
Voted with the majority
Black
Voted with the majority
Warren
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Clark
Voted with the majority
Whittaker
Voted with the majority
Burton
Voted with the majority
Frankfurter
Wrote the majority opinion
Harlan
Full Opinion by Justice John M. Harlan

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1957/1957_91/>
(last visited ).