Griffin v. Illinois

Media Items
Advocates
Charles A. Horsky (argued the cause for the petitioners)
William C. Wines (Attorney General of Illinois. argued the cause for the respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
95
Petitioner: 
Judson Griffin and James Crenshaw
Respondent: 
Illinois
Decided By: 
Warren Court (1955-1956)
Opinion: 
351 U.S. 12 (1956)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Griffin v. Illinois , 351 U.S. 12 (1956)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1955/1955_95)
Facts of the Case: 

Judson Griffin and James Crenshaw were indicted for armed robbery in Cook County, Illinois. Following their conviction, in preparation for filling for an appeal, Griffin and Crenshaw requested a transcript of their trial proceedings without cost, on the basis that they could not afford the standard fee for the transcript. The lower court dismissed the petition without hearing evidence.

Question: 

Did requiring Griffin and Crenshaw to pay a fee with their request for a transcript of their trial proceedings violate their rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion: 

Yes. In a 5–4 decision authored by Justice Hugo L. Black, the Court reasoned that there is "no meaningful distinction" between denying indigent defendants the right to appeal and denying them a trial. Because Illinois conceded that Griffin and Crenshaw could not file for appeal without a transcript, the Court found that their rights to due process and equal protection had been denied.

Decisions

Decision: 5 votes for Griffin, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Equal Protection

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Warren
Wrote the judgment of the Court
Black
Voted with the minority, joined Burton's dissent
Reed
Wrote a special concurrence
Frankfurter
Voted with the majority
Douglas
Wrote a dissent
Burton
Voted with the majority
Clark
Voted with the minority, joined Burton's dissent
Minton
Wrote a dissent, joined Burton's dissent
Harlan

Judgment of the Court by Justice Hugo L. Black