BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION (I)

Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
1
Petitioner 
Brown
Respondent 
Board of Education of Topeka
Consolidation 
Briggs v. Elliott, No. 2
Reargued: 
Tags
Term:
Facts of the Case 

Black children were denied admission to public schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting segregation according to the races. The white and black schools approached equality in terms of buildings, curricula, qualifications, and teacher salaries. This case was decided together with Briggs v. Elliott and Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County.

Question 

Does the segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race deprive the minority children of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment?

Conclusion 
Decision: 9 votes for Brown, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Equal Protection

Yes. Despite the equalization of the schools by "objective" factors, intangible issues foster and maintain inequality. Racial segregation in public education has a detrimental effect on minority children because it is interpreted as a sign of inferiority. The long-held doctrine that separate facilities were permissible provided they were equal was rejected. Separate but equal is inherently unequal in the context of public education. The unanimous opinion sounded the death-knell for all forms of state-maintained racial separation.

Cite this Page
BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION (I). The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 16 April 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1952/1952_1>.
BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION (I), The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1952/1952_1 (last visited April 16, 2014).
"BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION (I)," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed April 16, 2014, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1952/1952_1.