Shelley v. Kraemer

Media Items
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
72
Petitioner: 
Shelley
Respondent: 
Kraemer
Consolidation: 
McGhee v. Sipes, No. 87
Decided By: 
Vinson Court (1946-1949)
Opinion: 
334 U.S. 1 (1948)
Decided: 
Monday, May 3, 1948
Categories: 
housing, states, property, race, equal protection, race discrimination, discrimination

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Shelley v. Kraemer , 334 U.S. 1 (1948)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1947/1947_72)
Facts of the Case: 

The Kraemers were a white couple who owned a residence in a Missouri neighborhood governed by a restrictive covenant. This was a private agreement that prevented blacks from owning property in the Kraemers' subdivision. The Shelleys were a black couple who moved into the Kraemers neighborhood. The Kraemers went to court to enforce the restrictive covenant against the Shelleys.

Question: 

Does the enforcement of a racially restrictive covenant violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment?

Conclusion: 

State courts could not constitutionally prevent the sale of real property to blacks even if that property is covered by a racially restrictive covenant. Standing alone, racially restrictive covenants violate no rights. However, their enforcement by state court injunctions constitute state action in violation of the 14th Amendment.