Shelley v. Kraemer

Media Items
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
72
Petitioner: 
Shelley
Respondent: 
Kraemer
Consolidation: 
McGhee v. Sipes, No. 87
Decided By: 
Vinson Court (1946-1949)
Opinion: 
334 U.S. 1 (1948)
Decided: 
Monday, May 3, 1948
Categories: 
housing, states, property, race, equal protection, race discrimination, discrimination
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Shelley v. Kraemer , 334 U.S. 1 (1948)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1947/1947_72)
Facts of the Case: 

The Kraemers were a white couple who owned a residence in a Missouri neighborhood governed by a restrictive covenant. This was a private agreement that prevented blacks from owning property in the Kraemers' subdivision. The Shelleys were a black couple who moved into the Kraemers neighborhood. The Kraemers went to court to enforce the restrictive covenant against the Shelleys.

Question: 

Does the enforcement of a racially restrictive covenant violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment?

Conclusion: 

State courts could not constitutionally prevent the sale of real property to blacks even if that property is covered by a racially restrictive covenant. Standing alone, racially restrictive covenants violate no rights. However, their enforcement by state court injunctions constitute state action in violation of the 14th Amendment.

Decisions

Decision: 6 votes for Shelley, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: US Const Amend 14

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Vinson
Did not participate
Reed
Voted with the majority
Frankfurter
Voted with the majority
Douglas
Voted with the majority
Murphy
Did not participate
Jackson
Did not participate
Rutledge
Voted with the majority
Burton
Voted with the majority
Black

by Justice Fred M. Vinson

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court