<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="0.91">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: 1942 Term</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1942/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Cases, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  
   <item>
    <title>Hirabayashi v. United States (No. 870)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;In the wake of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, President Roosevelt acted to prevent incidents of subversion and espionage from individuals of Japanese descent living in the United States. He issued two executive orders which were quickly enacted into law. One gave the Secretary of War the power to designate certain parts of the country "military areas" and exclude certain persons from them. The second established the War Relocation Authority which had the power to remove, maintain, and supervise persons who were excluded from the military areas. Gordon Kiyoshi Hirabayashi, a student at the University of Washington, was convicted of violating a curfew and relocation order.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1942/1942_870/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>West Virginia State Board of Ed. v. Barnette (No. 591)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;The West Virginia Board of Education required that the flag salute be part of the program of activities in all public schools. All teachers and pupils were required to honor the Flag; refusal to salute was treated as "insubordination" and was punishable by expulsion and charges of delinquency.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1942/1942_591/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Wickard v. Filburn (No. 59)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Filburn was a small farmer in Ohio. He was given a wheat acreage allotment of 11.1 acres under a Department of Agriculture directive which authorized the government to set production quotas for wheat. Filburn harvested nearly 12 acres of wheat above his allotment. He claimed that he wanted thewheat for use on his farm, including feed for his poultry and livestock. Fiburn was penalized. He argued that the excess wheat was unrelated to commerce since he grew it for his own use.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1942/1942_59/</link>
   </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>
