The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Wednesday, May 6, 1942
Decision: Monday, June 1, 1942
Categories: criminal, mental health, sterilization

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

Oklahoma's Criminal Sterilization Act allowed the state to sterilize a person who had been convicted three or more times of crimes "amounting to felonies involving moral turpitude."

Question

Did the Act violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion

A unanimous Court held that the Act violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Since some crimes such as embezzlement, punishable as felonies in Oklahoma, were excluded from the Act's jurisdiction, Justice Douglas reasoned that the law had laid "an unequal hand on those who have committed intrinsically the same quality of offense." Moreover, Douglas viewed procreation as one of the fundamental rights requiring the judiciary's strict scrutiny.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Vote not yet set:

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1941/1941_782/>
(last visited ).