EX PARTE QUIRIN

Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
1_ORIG
Plaintiff 
Richard Quirin
Defendant 
United States
Consolidation 
Original, Ex parte Haupt
Original, Ex parte Kerling
Original, Ex parte Burger
Original, Ex parte Heinck
Original, Ex parte Thiel
Original, Ex parte Neubauer
No. 1, US ex rel. Quirin v. Cox
No. 2, US ex rel. Haupt v. Cox
No. 3, US ex rel. Kerling v. Cox
No. 4, US ex rel. Burger v. Cox
No. 5, US ex rel. Heinck v. Cox
No. 6, US ex rel. Thiel v. Cox
No. 7, US ex rel. Neubauer v. Cox
Opinion 
Argued 
Advocates
(argued the cause for the plaintiffs)
(Attorney General, Department of Justice, argued the cause for the United States)
Term:
Facts of the Case 

These cases concern Operation Pastorius, a failed attempt in June 1942 by Nazi agents to sabotage various U.S. targets. Following the declaration of war between the United States and Germany, eight German residents, Richard Quirin, Ernst Burger, George Dasch, Herbert Haupt, Heinrich Heinck, Edward Keiling, Herman Neubauer, and Werener Thiel, received training on sabotage at a school near Berlin. The men traveled to the United States via submarine. On the night of June 13, 1942, Burger, Heinrich, Quirin, and Dasch landed near Long Island, New York wearing German uniforms and carrying explosives. On the night of June 17, 1942, the remaining four came ashore in similar fashion at Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida. Shortly after the landings, Burger and Dasch backed out of the mission. Dasch turned himself in to the Federal Bureau of Investigations. All eight conspirators were subsequently arrested and, on the orders of President Franklin Roosevelt, tried by military commission. The commission found all eight men guilty and sentenced them to death. Because of their confessions and cooperation, President Roosevelt later commuted Burger and Dasch's sentences to life in prison. Arguing that the President exceeded his power in ordering the commission and that the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution protect their rights to a regular trial, seven of the eight conspirators, not including Dasch, filed petitions for a writ of habeas corpus in Federal District Court. Their claims were denied, and they appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Before the court ruled, however, they filed for hearing before the Supreme Court and, separately, filed petitions for habeas corpus directly with the Court. The Court, sitting in a special term, agreed to hear the cases.

Question 

Did the President exceed his authority in ordering a trial by military commission for the German saboteurs, thereby violating their rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments?

Conclusion 

No. In a unanimous opinion authored by Chief Justice Harlan Fisk Stone, the Court concluded that the conspirators, as spies without uniform whose purpose was sabotage, violated the law of war and were therefore unlawful enemy combatants. Noting that Congress had, under the Articles of War, authorized trial by military commission for unlawful enemy combatants, the Court therefore determined that the President had not exceeded his power. Furthermore, the Court asserted that the Fifth and Sixth Amendments "did not enlarge the right to jury trial" beyond those cases where it was understood by the framers to have been appropriate. Therefore, because the amendments cannot be read "as either abolishing all trials by military tribunals, save those of the personnel of our own armed forces, or, what in effect comes to the same thing, as imposing on all such tribunals the necessity of proceeding against unlawful enemy belligerents only on presentment and trial by jury," the rights of the conspirators were not violated.

Cite this Page
EX PARTE QUIRIN. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 17 August 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1941/1941_1_ORIG>.
EX PARTE QUIRIN, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1941/1941_1_ORIG (last visited August 17, 2014).
"EX PARTE QUIRIN," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed August 17, 2014, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1941/1941_1_ORIG.