<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="0.91">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: 1940 Term Decisions</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1940/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  
   <item>
    <title>U. S. v. Classic (No. 618)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1940/1940_618/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Darby (No. 82)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Was the act a legitimate exercise of Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The unanimous Court affirmed the right of Congress to exercise "to its utmost extent" the powers reserved for it in the Commerce Clause. Relying heavily on the Court's decision in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), Justice Stone argued that the "motive and purpose of a regulation of interstate commerce are matters for the legislative judgment . . . over which the courts are given no control." Congress acted with proper authority in outlawing substandard labor conditions since they have a significant impact on interstate commerce.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1940/1940_82/</link>
   </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>
