The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Thursday, December 19, 1940
Decision: Monday, February 3, 1941
Categories: commerce clause, congress, criminal, labor, regulation, tenth amendment

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

In 1938, Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act to regulate many aspects of employment including minimum wages, maximum weekly hours, and child labor. Corporations which engaged in interstate commerce or produced goods which were sold in other states were punished for violating the statute.

Question

Was the act a legitimate exercise of Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce?

Conclusion

The unanimous Court affirmed the right of Congress to exercise "to its utmost extent" the powers reserved for it in the Commerce Clause. Relying heavily on the Court's decision in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), Justice Stone argued that the "motive and purpose of a regulation of interstate commerce are matters for the legislative judgment . . . over which the courts are given no control." Congress acted with proper authority in outlawing substandard labor conditions since they have a significant impact on interstate commerce.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Vote not yet set:

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100 (1941),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1940/1940_82/>
(last visited ).