WEST COAST HOTEL CO. v. PARRISH

Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
293
Petitioner 
West Coast Hotel Co.
Respondent 
Parrish
Term:
Facts of the Case 

Elsie Parrish, an employee of the West Coast Hotel Company, received sub- minimum wage compensation for her work. Parrish brought a suit to recover the difference between the wages paid to her and the minimum wage fixed by state law.

Question 

Did the minimum wage law violate the liberty of contract as construed under the Fifth Amendment as applied by the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion 
Decision: 5 votes for Parrish, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Minimum Wages for Women Act, 1913 Wash. Laws 174; 14th Amendment

In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that the establishment of minimum wages for women was constitutionally legitimate. The Court noted that the Constitution did not speak of the freedom of contract and that liberty was subject to the restraints of due process. The Court also noted that employers and employees were not equally "free" in negotiating contracts, since employees often were constrained by practical and economic realities. This was found to be especially true in the case of women. This case explicitly overruled the Court's decision in Adkins v. Children's Hospital (1923).

Cite this Page
WEST COAST HOTEL CO. v. PARRISH. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 17 August 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1936/1936_293>.
WEST COAST HOTEL CO. v. PARRISH, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1936/1936_293 (last visited August 17, 2014).
"WEST COAST HOTEL CO. v. PARRISH," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed August 17, 2014, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1936/1936_293.