Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
West Coast Hotel Co.
Facts of the Case 

Elsie Parrish, an employee of the West Coast Hotel Company, received sub- minimum wage compensation for her work. Parrish brought a suit to recover the difference between the wages paid to her and the minimum wage fixed by state law.


Did the minimum wage law violate the liberty of contract as construed under the Fifth Amendment as applied by the Fourteenth Amendment?

Decision: 5 votes for Parrish, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Minimum Wages for Women Act, 1913 Wash. Laws 174; 14th Amendment

In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that the establishment of minimum wages for women was constitutionally legitimate. The Court noted that the Constitution did not speak of the freedom of contract and that liberty was subject to the restraints of due process. The Court also noted that employers and employees were not equally "free" in negotiating contracts, since employees often were constrained by practical and economic realities. This was found to be especially true in the case of women. This case explicitly overruled the Court's decision in Adkins v. Children's Hospital (1923).

Cite this Page
WEST COAST HOTEL CO. v. PARRISH. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 30 August 2015. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1936/1936_293>.
WEST COAST HOTEL CO. v. PARRISH, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1936/1936_293 (last visited August 30, 2015).
"WEST COAST HOTEL CO. v. PARRISH," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed August 30, 2015, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1936/1936_293.