ASHWANDER v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
404
Petitioner 
Ashwander
Respondent 
Tennessee Valley Authority
Term:
Facts of the Case 

The Tennessee Valley Authority was a government corporation established as part of the New Deal to improve the economy of the state. For example, projects of the TVA included improving navigation on the state's rivers, constructing flood control projects, and generating hydroelectric power. Shareholders in a private Tennessee power company sued to prevent the TVA from acquiring over half of the company's property and equipment. The proposed contract which detailed the sale would allow the government agency to allocate electric power to consumers.

Question 

Did Congress exceed its power in implementing and administering the TVA?

Conclusion 

No. The Court held that Congress did not abuse its power with the TVA. Justice Hughes argued that the Wilson Dam, the location where the TVA was in the business of generating electricity, had been built originally in the interest of national defense: it produced materials involved in munitions manufacture. The government could sell excess electricity to consumers without violating the Constitution. This case is especially important for the concept of judicial review as expressed in Justice Brandeis's concurrence.. Brandeis articulated a set of "rules" governing the appropriateness of judicial review.

Cite this Page
ASHWANDER v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 23 October 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1935/1935_404>.
ASHWANDER v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1935/1935_404 (last visited October 23, 2014).
"ASHWANDER v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed October 23, 2014, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1935/1935_404.