<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="0.91">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: 1934 Term</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1934/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Cases, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  
   <item>
    <title>Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc. (No. 604)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1934/1934_604/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Humphrey's Executor v. United States (No. 667)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;President Hoover appointed, and the Senate confirmed, Humphrey as a commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). In 1933, President Roosevelt asked for Humphrey's resignation since the latter was a conservative and had jurisdiction over many of Roosevelt's New Deal policies. When Humphrey refused to resign, Roosevelt fired him because of his policy positions. However, the FTC Act only allowed a president to remove a commissioner for "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office." Since Humphrey died shortly after being dismissed, his executor sued to recover Humphrey's lost salary.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1934/1934_667/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan (No. 135)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1934/1934_135/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Perry v. United States (No. 532)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1934/1934_532/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (No. 854)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Section 3 of the National Industrial Recovery Act empowered the President to implement industrial codes to regulate weekly employment hours, wages, and minimum ages of employees. The codes had standing as penal statutes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1934/1934_854/</link>
   </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>
