Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States

Media Items
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
854
Petitioner: 
Schechter Poultry Corp.
Respondent: 
United States
Decided By: 
Hughes Court (1932-1937)
Opinion: 
295 U.S. 495 (1935)
Categories: 
tenth amendment, regulation, monopoly, commerce clause, separation of powers, congress
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States , 295 U.S. 495 (1935)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1934/1934_854)
Facts of the Case: 

Section 3 of the National Industrial Recovery Act empowered the President to implement industrial codes to regulate weekly employment hours, wages, and minimum ages of employees. The codes had standing as penal statutes.

Question: 

Did Congress unconstitutionally delegate legislative power to the President?

Conclusion: 

The Court held that Section 3 was "without precedent" and violated the Constitution. The law did not establish rules or standards to evaluate industrial activity. In other words, it did not make codes, but simply empowered the President to do so. A unanimous Court found this to be an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Schechter Poultry Corp., 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: U.S. Const. Art I; U.S. Const. Amend. 10; 15 U.S.C. § 703 (1933) (National Industrial Recovery Act § 3)

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Hughes
Voted with the majority
Van Devanter
Voted with the majority
McReynolds
Voted with the majority
Brandeis
Voted with the majority
Sutherland
Voted with the majority
Butler
Voted with the majority, joined Cardozo's special concurrence
Stone
Voted with the majority
Roberts
Wrote a special concurrence
Cardozo

Full Opinion by Justice Charles E. Hughes

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court