STAFFORD v. WALLACE

Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
687
Petitioner 
Stafford
Respondent 
Wallace
Decided By 
Term:
Facts of the Case 

In 1921, Congress enacted the Packers and Stockyards Act in an attempt to regulate activities of meat packers that were unfair, discriminatory, or deceptive and encouraged the formation of monopolies. Stafford sought an injunction against the enforcement of the Act. After his application was denied, he sought review by the Supreme Court. This case was decided together with Burton v. Clyne.

Question 

Did Congress have authority under the Commerce Clause to pass and enforce the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921?

Conclusion 

In a 7-to-1 decision, the Court held that the activities controlled by the Act did indeed burden the freedom of commerce and fell within the regulatory jurisdiction of Congress. The Court argued that Congress did not have to wait until after deleterious economic monopolies had developed to regulate particular industries. Drawing on its decision in Swift v. United States, the Court found that business done in the stockyards was an essential part of interstate commerce and thus subject to national legislation.

Cite this Page
STAFFORD v. WALLACE. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 17 August 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1921/1921_687>.
STAFFORD v. WALLACE, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1921/1921_687 (last visited August 17, 2014).
"STAFFORD v. WALLACE," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed August 17, 2014, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1921/1921_687.