<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="0.91">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: 1915 Term Decisions</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1915/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  
   <item>
    <title>Bunting v. Oregon (No. 38)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Did the law interfere with liberty of contract protected by the Fourteenth Amendment?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Court upheld the decision of the Oregon Supreme Court and found the law constitutional. Relying on the justifications made by the Oregon court and legislature, Justice McKenna dismissed Bunting's contention that the law did nothing to preserve the health of employees. The Court found that the law did not provide an unfair advantage to certain types of employers in the labor market since it regulated the hours of service for workers and not the wages that they earned. Under the Oregon statute, workers and their employers were still free to implement a wage scheme which was agreeable to both of them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1915/1915_38/</link>
   </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>
