The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Wednesday, January 15, 1908
Decision: Monday, February 24, 1908
Categories: discrimination, due process, labor, police power, sex discrimination, states

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

Oregon enacted a law that limited women to ten hours of work in factories and laundries.

Question

Does the Oregon law violate a woman's freedom of contract implicit in the liberty protected by due process of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion

There was no constitutional violation. The factory and laundry owners claimed that there was no reasonable connection between the law and public health, safety, or welfare. In a famous brief in defense of the Oregon law, attorney Louis Brandeis elaborately detailed expert reports on the harmful physical, economic and social effects of long working hours on women. Brewer's opinion was based on the proposition that physical and social differences between the sexes warranted a different rule respecting labor contracts. Theretofore, gender was not a basis for such distinctions. Brewer's opinion conveyed the accepted wisdom of the day: that women were unequal and inferior to men.

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1907/1907_107/>
(last visited ).