The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Thursday, March 19, 1908
Decision: Monday, November 9, 1908
Categories: citizenship, criminal, fifth amendment, privileges and immunities, self-incrimination

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

Twining, a bank director, was charged with a misdemeanor (deceiving a bank examiner). Twining declined to testify at his trial. Under New Jersey law, the prosecutor commented upon Twining's failure to testify. A jury convicted Twining; he appealed.

Question

Does comment upon a defendant's failure to testify violate the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion

Neither the Privileges and Immunities Clause nor the Due Process Clause embraces the right against self-incrimination found in the Fifth Amendment. Moody rested the Court's opinion on the historical record, which led him to the view that the right against self-incrimination was not fundamental.

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78 (1908),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1907/1907_10/>
(last visited ).