|
Abstract
|
Advocates
|
Facts of the Case
Twining, a bank director, was charged with a misdemeanor (deceiving a bank examiner). Twining declined to testify at his trial. Under New Jersey law, the prosecutor commented upon Twining's failure to testify. A jury convicted Twining; he appealed.
Question
Does comment upon a defendant's failure to testify violate the Fourteenth Amendment?
Conclusion
Neither the Privileges and Immunities Clause nor the Due Process Clause embraces the right against self-incrimination found in the Fifth Amendment. Moody rested the Court's opinion on the historical record, which led him to the view that the right against self-incrimination was not fundamental.
Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78 (1908),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1907/1907_10/>
(last visited ).