JACOBSON v. MASSACHUSETTS
Term:
- 1901-1939
Facts of the Case
A Massachusetts law allowed cities to require residents to be vaccinated against smallpox. Cambridge adopted such an ordinance, with some exceptions. Jacobson refused to comply with the requirement and was fined five dollars.
Question
Did the mandatory vaccination law violate Jacobson's Fourteenth Amendment right to liberty?
Conclusion
The Court held that the law was a legitimate exercise of the state's police power to protect the public health and safety of its citizens. Local boards of health determined when mandatory vaccinations were needed, thus making the requirement neither unreasonable nor arbitrarily imposed.
Javascript is required to view this map.
Cite this Page
JACOBSON v. MASSACHUSETTS. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 27 April 2013. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1904/1904_70>.
JACOBSON v. MASSACHUSETTS, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1904/1904_70 (last visited April 27, 2013).
"JACOBSON v. MASSACHUSETTS," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed April 27, 2013, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1904/1904_70.