<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="0.91">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: 1894 Term</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1894/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Cases, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  
   <item>
    <title>Pollock v. Farmers' Loan &amp; Trust Co. (No. 893)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;The Constitution gave the states the power to impose direct taxation. The federal government could impose direct taxes as well, but only if those taxes were apportioned among the states in proportion to their representation in Congress. In this case the Court examined a national income tax passed by Congress in 1894. This case was decided together with Hyde v. Continental Trust Company of the City of New York.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1894/1894_893/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. E.C. Knight Co. (No. 675)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;The Congress passed the Sherman Anti-Trust Act in 1890 as a response to the public concern in the growth of giant combinations controlling tranportation, industry, and commerce. The Act aimed to stop the concentration of wealth and economic power in the hands of the few. It outlawed "every contract, combination...or conspiracy, in restraint of trade" or interstate commerce, and it declared every attempt to monopolize any part of trade or commerce to be illegal. The E.C. Knight Company was such a combination controlling over 98 percent of the sugar-refining business in the United States.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1894/1894_675/</link>
   </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>
