Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
United States
E.C. Knight Co.
Location: Congress
Facts of the Case 

The Congress passed the Sherman Anti-Trust Act in 1890 as a response to the public concern in the growth of giant combinations controlling tranportation, industry, and commerce. The Act aimed to stop the concentration of wealth and economic power in the hands of the few. It outlawed "every contract, combination...or conspiracy, in restraint of trade" or interstate commerce, and it declared every attempt to monopolize any part of trade or commerce to be illegal. The E.C. Knight Company was such a combination controlling over 98 percent of the sugar-refining business in the United States.


Did Congress exceed its constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause when it enacted the Sherman Anti-Trust Act?

Decision: 8 votes for E. C. Knight Co., 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Sherman Antitrust Act; US Const. Art 1, Section 8

The Act was constitutional but it did not apply to manufacturing. Manufacturing was not commerce, declared Fuller for the majority; the law did not reach the admitted monopolization of manufacturing (in this case, refining sugar). Although American Sugar had monopolized manufacturing, the Court found no violation of the Sherman Act because the acquisition of the Philadelphia refineries involved intrastate commerce. The trust did not lead to control of interstate commerce and so "affects it only incidentally and indirectly."

Cite this Page
UNITED STATES v. E.C. KNIGHT CO.. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 30 August 2015. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1894/1894_675>.
UNITED STATES v. E.C. KNIGHT CO., The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1894/1894_675 (last visited August 30, 2015).
"UNITED STATES v. E.C. KNIGHT CO.," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed August 30, 2015, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1894/1894_675.