THE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES

Print this Page
Case Basics
Petitioner 
The Civil Rights Cases
Opinion 
Term:
Location: Congress
Facts of the Case 

The Civil Rights Act of 1875 affirmed the equality of all persons in the enjoyment of transportation facilities, in hotels and inns, and in theaters and places of public amusement. Though privately owned, these businesses were like public utilities, exercising public functions for the benefit of the public and, thus, subject to public regulation. In five separate cases, a black person was denied the same accommodations as a white person in violation of the 1875 Act.

Question 

Does the Civil Rights Act of 1875 violate the 10th Amendment of the Constitution which reserves all powers not granted to the national government to the states or to the people?

Conclusion 
Decision: 8 votes for , 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Civil Rights Act of 1875; US Const. Amend 13 and 14

The Fourteenth Amendment restrains only state action. And the fifth section of the Amendment empowers Congress only to enforce the prohibition on state action. The amendment did not authorize national legislation on subjects which are within the domain of the state. Private acts of racial discrimination were simply private wrongs that the national government was powerless to correct.

Cite this Page
THE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 25 November 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1882/1882_2>.
THE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1882/1882_2 (last visited November 25, 2014).
"THE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed November 25, 2014, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1882/1882_2.