Munn v. Illinois

Media Items
Case Basics
Petitioner: 
Munn
Respondent: 
Illinois
Decided By: 
Waite Court (1874-1877)
Opinion: 
94 U.S. 113 (1877)
Categories: 
states, fourteenth amendment, criminal, due process
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Munn v. Illinois , 94 U.S. 113 (1877)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1875/1875_0)
Facts of the Case: 

Illinois regulated grain warehouse and elevator rates by establishing maximum rates for their use.

Question: 

Did the state-imposed rates deny the warehouse and elevator owners equal protection and due process under the 14th Amendment?

Conclusion: 

No on both counts. Waite, for the Court, took a broad view of the state's police power. He argued that the states may regulate the use of private property "when such regulation becomes necessary for the public good." Waite resurrected an ancient legal doctrine to support his view: "When property is affected with a public interest, it ceases to be juris privati only."

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for Illinois, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Illinois Warehouse Act of 1871; US Constitution, 14th Amendment

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Waite
Voted with the majority
Clifford
Voted with the majority
Swayne
Voted with the majority
Miller
Voted with the majority
Davis
Wrote a dissent
Field
Voted with the minority, joined Field's dissent
Strong
Voted with the majority
Bradley
Voted with the majority
Hunt

Full Opinion by Justice Morrison R. Waite

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court