<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="0.91">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: 1827 Term Decisions</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1827/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  
   <item>
    <title>Ogden v. Saunders (No. None)</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Does a state bankruptcy law applying to contracts made after the law's passage violate the Obligation of Contracts Clause of the Constitution?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No. This is not a violation of the Contracts Clause. The state law remainscontrolling. The obligation of a contract made after the enactment of a bankruptcy statute is subject to the bankruptcy statute provisions. In effect, the bankruptcy statute becomes part of all subsequent contracts, limiting their obligation but not impairing them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1827/1827_0/</link>
   </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>
