McCulloch v. Maryland

Media Items
Case Basics
Petitioner: 
McCulloch
Respondent: 
Maryland
Opinion: 
17 U.S. 316 (1819)
Categories: 
supremacy clause, necessary-and-proper, implied-powers, federalism
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, McCulloch v. Maryland , 17 U.S. 316 (1819)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1819/1819_0)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1816, Congress chartered The Second Bank of the United States. In 1818, the state of Maryland passed legislation to impose taxes on the bank. James W. McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the bank, refused to pay the tax.

Question: 

The case presented two questions: Did Congress have the authority to establish the bank? Did the Maryland law unconstitutionally interfere with congressional powers?

Conclusion: 

In a unanimous decision, the Court held that Congress had the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers. Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Marshall noted that Congress possessed unenumerated powers not explicitly outlined in the Constitution. Marshall also held that while the states retained the power of taxation, "the constitution and the laws made in pursuance thereof are supreme. . .they control the constitution and laws of the respective states, and cannot be controlled by them."

Decisions

Decision: 7 votes for McCulloch, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: US Const. Art 1, Section 8 Clauses 1 and 18

Sort by Ideology

Wrote the majority opinion
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Washington
Voted with the majority
Johnson
Voted with the majority
Livingston
Voted with the majority
Todd
Voted with the majority
Duvall
Voted with the majority
Story

Full Opinion by Justice John Marshall

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court