Print this Page
Case Basics
Dartmouth College
Facts of the Case 

In 1816, the New Hampshire legislature attempted to change Dartmouth College-- a privately funded institution--into a state university. The legislature changed the school's corporate charter by transferring the control of trustee appointments to the governor. In an attempt to regain authority over the resources of Dartmouth College, the old trustees filed suit against William H. Woodward, who sided with the new appointees.


Did the New Hampshire legislature unconstitutionally interfere with Dartmouth College's rights under the Contract Clause?

Decision: 5 votes for Dartmouth College, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: US Const. Art 1, Section 10

In a 6-to-1 decision, the Court held that the College's corporate charter qualified as a contract between private parties, with which the legislature could not interfere. The fact that the government had commissioned the charter did not transform the school into a civil institution. Chief Justice Marshall's opinion emphasized that the term "contract" referred to transactions involving individual property rights, not to "the political relations between the government and its citizens."

Cite this Page
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE v. WOODWARD. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 31 August 2015. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1818/1818_0>.
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE v. WOODWARD, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1818/1818_0 (last visited August 31, 2015).
"DARTMOUTH COLLEGE v. WOODWARD," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed August 31, 2015, http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1818/1818_0.