Shady Grove Orthopedics Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Media Items
Advocates
Scott L. Nelson (argued the cause for the petitioner)
Christopher Landau (argued the cause for the respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
08-1008
Petitioner: 
Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A.
Respondent: 
Allstate Insurance Company
Granted: 
Monday, May 4, 2009

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Shady Grove Orthopedics Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co. U.S. ___
available at: (http://oyez.org/2000-2009/2009/2009_08_1008)
Facts of the Case: 

Shady Grove Orthopedics Associates (Shady Grove), on behalf of a class of plaintiffs, sued Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) in part for Allstate's alleged failure to pay interest penalties on overdue insurance payments as prescribed by New York statute. Allstate moved to dismiss relying on New York's rules of civil procedure which instruct that class action lawsuits are inappropriate unless specifically prescribed by statute. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York agreed that Shady Grove's class action claim was not authorized and thus dismissed its claim.

On appeal, Shady Grove argued that the New York rules of civil procedure conflict with Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and thus were not applicable. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit disagreed with Shady Grove and affirmed the district court. The Second Circuit, reasoning from the Supreme Court's decision in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tomkins, stated that the New York rules of civil procedure did not conflict with Rule 23 and thus Rule 23 did not control.

Question: 

1) Can a state legislature prohibit federal courts from using a federal class action rule for a state law claim?

2) Can a state legislature dictate civil procedure in federal courts?